Home/Sixth Circuit/Oakley Barnett v. Paul Jones, Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division

Oakley Barnett v. Paul Jones, Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division

279 F.2d 873, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4419
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 1960
Docket14234
StatusPublished

This text of 279 F.2d 873 (Oakley Barnett v. Paul Jones, Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oakley Barnett v. Paul Jones, Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, 279 F.2d 873, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4419 (6th Cir. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, it appearing to the Court that the District Judge did not abuse his discretion in transferring the case from the Eastern to the Western Division of the Northern District of Ohio,

It is ordered that said .petition be denied.

Fannin, Admx. v. Jones, 6 Cir., 1956, 229 F.2d 368.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fannin v. Jones
229 F.2d 368 (Sixth Circuit, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 F.2d 873, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakley-barnett-v-paul-jones-judge-of-the-united-states-district-court-for-ca6-1960.