Oakland Truck Sales, Inc. v. Westfield Manufacturing Corp.

Sixth Circuit

Oakland Truck Sales, Inc. v. Westfield Manufacturing Corp.

234 F.2d 661, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3748

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 18, 1956

Docket12699

StatusPublished

This text of 234 F.2d 661 (Oakland Truck Sales, Inc. v. Westfield Manufacturing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oakland Truck Sales, Inc. v. Westfield Manufacturing Corp., 234 F.2d 661, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3748 (6th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel;

And it appearing that service of process upon appellant was valid, that there was no error prejudicial to the appellant in the trial court’s rulings upon the evidence, conduct of the trial, or instructions to the jury, and that the verdict is supported by substantial evidence;

It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel;

And it appearing that service of process upon appellant was valid, that there was no error prejudicial to the appellant in the trial court’s rulings upon the evidence, conduct of the trial, or instructions to the jury, and that the verdict is supported by substantial evidence;

It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 F.2d 661, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakland-truck-sales-inc-v-westfield-manufacturing-corp-ca6-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack