Oakland Truck Sales, Inc. v. Westfield Manufacturing Corp.

Sixth Circuit

Oakland Truck Sales, Inc. v. Westfield Manufacturing Corp.

234 F.2d 661, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3748

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 18, 1956·No. 12699·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel;

And it appearing that service of process upon appellant was valid, that there was no error prejudicial to the appellant in the trial court’s rulings upon the evidence, conduct of the trial, or instructions to the jury, and that the verdict is supported by substantial evidence;

It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel;

And it appearing that service of process upon appellant was valid, that there was no error prejudicial to the appellant in the trial court’s rulings upon the evidence, conduct of the trial, or instructions to the jury, and that the verdict is supported by substantial evidence;

It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Oakland Truck Sales, Inc. v. Westfield Manufacturing Corp., 234 F.2d 661, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3748 (6th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

234 F.2d 661 (Oakland Truck Sales, Inc. v. Westfield Manufacturing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related