OAKLAND PARK MRI, INC. a/a/o JOSE CRUZ v. PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida

OAKLAND PARK MRI, INC. a/a/o JOSE CRUZ v. PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 11, 2021

Docket21-0914

StatusPublished

This text of OAKLAND PARK MRI, INC. a/a/o JOSE CRUZ v. PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY (OAKLAND PARK MRI, INC. a/a/o JOSE CRUZ v. PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

OAKLAND PARK MRI, INC. a/a/o JOSE CRUZ v. PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

OAKLAND PARK MRI, INC. a/a/o JOSE CRUZ, Appellant,

v.

PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 4D21-914

[August 11, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ellen Feld, Judge; L.T. Case No. COWE 19-006600.

Christina M. Kalin and John C. Daly of Daly & Barber, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

Michael A. Graham of Progressive PIP House Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the dismissal of its complaint due to the parties’ failure to file a joint pretrial stipulation. Appellant argues it was denied due process because the trial court sua sponte dismissed its complaint without notice or an opportunity to be heard. Appellee concedes error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See, e.g., Fed. Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n v. Sanchez, 187 So. 3d 341, 342 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI