Oakland Hotel Co. v. Driscoll

Appellate Court of Illinois

Oakland Hotel Co. v. Driscoll

67 Ill. App. 114, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 27

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 14, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 Ill. App. 114 (Oakland Hotel Co. v. Driscoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oakland Hotel Co. v. Driscoll, 67 Ill. App. 114, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 27 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court.

There being no assignment of errors written upon or attached to the record filed in this cause, as required by the rule, and none appearing anywhere except in the abstract, 'there is nothing for this court to act upon. We refer to Lang v. Max, 50 Ill. App. 465, where many authorities are cited. Later decisions are, Hruby v. Vokoun, 55 Ill. App. 457, and Brown v. The H. W. Boies Co., 58 Ill. App. 274.

We may add that the point is urged in appellee’s brief, filed as long ago as November 2, 1896, and that no motion for leave to remedy the defect has been made, as might hai7e been done.

Instead, however, of dismissing the appeal, as was done in many of the cases referred to, we will follow a later authority of the Supreme Court, and affirm the judgment. Lancaster v. W. & S. Ry. Co., 132 Ill 492.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI