Oakland County v. Bice

Michigan Court of Appeals

Oakland County v. Bice

178 N.W.2d 126, 23 Mich. App. 148, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1822

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 9, 1970

DocketDocket No. 6,411

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 N.W.2d 126 (Oakland County v. Bice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oakland County v. Bice, 178 N.W.2d 126, 23 Mich. App. 148, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1822 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was commenced pursuant to CLS 1961, §§ 750.308 and 750.308a (Stat Ann 1954 Rev §§ 28.540 and 28.540[1]) to confiscate $35,000 seized under a grand jury subpoena during a judicial investigation into alleged illegal gaming operations in Oakland County. The judgment below awarded the money to the United States of America in satisfaction of a tax lien against one Roy L. Clark.

This appeal of the Bices raises many serious legal questions with respect to the proceedings here reviewed. However, the trial court found that neither of the Bices owned the $35,000 involved, and the record before us sustains that finding. Bices had no standing in this litigation, and we find it unnecessary to decide the issues raised by them on this appeal.

Affirmed but without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action was commenced pursuant to CLS 1961, §§ 750.308 and 750.308a (Stat Ann 1954 Rev §§ 28.540 and 28.540[1]) to confiscate $35,000 seized under a grand jury subpoena during a judicial investigation into alleged illegal gaming operations in Oakland County. The judgment below awarded the money to the United States of America in satisfaction of a tax lien against one Roy L. Clark.

This appeal of the Bices raises many serious legal questions with respect to the proceedings here reviewed. However, the trial court found that neither of the Bices owned the $35,000 involved, and the record before us sustains that finding. Bices had no standing in this litigation, and we find it unnecessary to decide the issues raised by them on this appeal.

Affirmed but without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 N.W.2d 126, 23 Mich. App. 148, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakland-county-v-bice-michctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack