Oakhill Associates v. D'Amato
625 A.2d 826, 225 Conn. 926, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 144
This text of 625 A.2d 826 (Oakhill Associates v. D'Amato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oakhill Associates v. D'Amato, 625 A.2d 826, 225 Conn. 926, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 144 (Colo. 1993).
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 356 (AC 11098), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court could misallocate the burden of proof regarding liability and still conclude that the plaintiff was not damaged?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Oakhill Associates v. D'Amato
638 A.2d 31 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
625 A.2d 826, 225 Conn. 926, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakhill-associates-v-damato-conn-1993.