Oakes v. Smith

48 S.E. 942, 121 Ga. 317, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 130
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 12, 1904·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Lamar, J.

1. Where an attachment has been dismissed and a suit is brought, on the bond, the plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees for defending the attachment suit, together with such other damages as were proximately occasioned by the levy on the plaintiff’s property. Fourth National Bank v. Mayer, 96 Ga. 128.

2. Such reasonable attorney’s fees may be recovered where the liability has been incurred, even though they have not actually been expended before the trial of the suit on the attachment bond.

3. In the present case, even if there was conflict as to the damage caused by the levy and seizure, there was uncontradicted testimony that the defendant had incurred a liability for attorney’s fees in defending the attachment suit f and a new trial should be granted, it appearing that the verdict was gener-. ally for the obligor in the bond.

Judgment reverseA.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oakes v. Smith, 48 S.E. 942, 121 Ga. 317, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 130 (Ga. 1904).

48 S.E. 942 (Oakes v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ace-Hi Electric, Inc. v. Steinberg
213 S.E.2d 71 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Luttrell
134 S.E.2d 77 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Maryland Casualty Company v. Tow
30 S.E.2d 433 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Hinton-Bellah Inc. v. Thebit
9 S.E.2d 779 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Parker v. Nolan
139 S.E. 429 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. United States Conservation Co.
122 S.E. 728 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Collins v. Myers
117 S.E. 265 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)