Oakes v. Riter

118 A.D. 772, 103 N.Y.S. 849, 39 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 245, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 749
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 1907·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Clarke, J. :

The defendant Biter is a non-resident of the State of New York and is now without the State, being in the city of Pittsburg, Pa., where lie resides. An issue of fact has been joined and the testimony of the defendant is material. Said defendant applied to the Special Term for an order for the issuance of a commission for the purpose of talcing his testimony to be used upon the trial upon written interrogatories.

The moving papers-set up the necessary facts as prescribed by sections 887 and 888 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and, in addition thereto, that said Biter was seriously ill and confined to his bed in the city , of Pittsburg.

Section 887 provides that “ In a case specified in the next section, where it appears by affidavit on the application of either party that the testimony of one or more witnesses not within the State is material to the applicant, a commission may be issúed

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oakes v. Riter, 118 A.D. 772, 103 N.Y.S. 849, 39 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 245, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

118 A.D. 772 (Oakes v. Riter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anchor Realty Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.
93 Misc. 64 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Estrick v. Kobre
84 Misc. 39 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Zeggio v. Robinson
137 N.Y.S. 1104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Fisher v. South Shore Traction Co
70 Misc. 529 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)