Oakes v. Howell

Eighth Circuit

Oakes v. Howell

547 F. App'x 808

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 16, 2013

DocketNo. 13-2005

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 547 F. App'x 808 (Oakes v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oakes v. Howell, 547 F. App'x 808 (8th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Phillip Oakes appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for damages, asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. After careful de novo review, see Sutherland v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., 580 F.3d 748, 750 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal, and accordingly we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Phillip Oakes appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for damages, asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. After careful de novo review, see Sutherland v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., 580 F.3d 748, 750 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal, and accordingly we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 F. App'x 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakes-v-howell-ca8-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack