Oakes v. Howell

Eighth Circuit

Oakes v. Howell

547 F. App'x 808

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 16, 2013·No. No. 13-2005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Phillip Oakes appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for damages, asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. After careful de novo review, see Sutherland v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., 580 F.3d 748, 750 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal, and accordingly we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Phillip Oakes appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for damages, asserting a claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. After careful de novo review, see Sutherland v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., 580 F.3d 748, 750 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal, and accordingly we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Oakes v. Howell, 547 F. App'x 808 (8th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

547 F. App'x 808 (Oakes v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related