Oakes v. City of Providence
This text of 433 A.2d 687 (Oakes v. City of Providence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This case came before the court on the City’s motion to stay a Superior Court order granting plaintiff’s prayer for the issuance of a writ of mandamus pending this appeal. Upon review of the record however, we find that no evidentiary hearing on the petition for mandamus was conducted below and therefore, we are unable to review the correctness of the trial judge’s ruling.
Accordingly, the defendant’s appeal is hereby sustained, the order granting the petition for writ of mandamus is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court in order that an evidentiary hearing may be conducted on the plaintiff’s complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
433 A.2d 687, 1981 R.I. LEXIS 1362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oakes-v-city-of-providence-ri-1981.