Oak Worksted Mills v. McCaughn
6 F.2d 662, 5 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 5494, 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1167, 5 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 5494
Opinion
The corn trolling facts in this ease are substantially [663]*663identical with those in the case of Emaus Silk Co. v. McCaughn (D. C.) 6 F.(2d) 660, in which an opinion was filed this day.
Eor the reasons stated in that opinion, plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction herein is denied, and a decree may be entered dismissing the bill.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oak Worksted Mills v. McCaughn, 6 F.2d 662, 5 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 5494, 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1167, 5 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 5494 (E.D. Pa. 1925).
6 F.2d 662 (Oak Worksted Mills v. McCaughn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
42 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1949)