Oak Worksted Mills v. McCaughn
6 F.2d 662, 5 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 5494, 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1167, 5 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 5494
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 8, 1925
DocketNo. 3379
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 6 F.2d 662 (Oak Worksted Mills v. McCaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oak Worksted Mills v. McCaughn, 6 F.2d 662, 5 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 5494, 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1167, 5 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 5494 (E.D. Pa. 1925).
Opinion
The corn trolling facts in this ease are substantially [663]*663identical with those in the case of Emaus Silk Co. v. McCaughn (D. C.) 6 F.(2d) 660, in which an opinion was filed this day.
Eor the reasons stated in that opinion, plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction herein is denied, and a decree may be entered dismissing the bill.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
42 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 F.2d 662, 5 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 5494, 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1167, 5 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 5494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oak-worksted-mills-v-mccaughn-paed-1925.