Oak Park Trust & Savings Bank v. Murphey

183 Ill. App. 402
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedDecember 8, 1913
DocketGen. No. 18,181
StatusPublished

This text of 183 Ill. App. 402 (Oak Park Trust & Savings Bank v. Murphey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oak Park Trust & Savings Bank v. Murphey, 183 Ill. App. 402 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Appeal and error, § 866* —when abstract of record is insufficient. An abstract of record which is merely an index ‘does not comply with Rule 19 of the Appellate Court, first district, and is insufficient. 4. Appeal and error, § 1712*—when error is waived. Errors assigned but not argued are waived. 5. Mortgages, § 575*—time when decree may be vacated. Under R. S. 1911, c. 22, § 19, J. & A., If 899, the right of a defendant in foreclosure served by publication to question the propriety of the decree by filing a motion- for leave to answer the original bill of foreclosure must be exercised within three years after the entry of the decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 Ill. App. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oak-park-trust-savings-bank-v-murphey-illappct-1913.