O. W. Hunkle & Co. v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

O. W. Hunkle & Co. v. State

4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 15, 1918 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 8

Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided November 26, 1918·Published

Opinion

The claimant, at the request of the State of Illinois, requested claimant to furnish Fideliey Bonds to cover certain employees in the State Grain Inspection Department, named in the-declaration, which it did.

The proper charges for services are particularly itemized with the numbers of the policies and premiums due for each, showing a total amount of earned premiums by cancellation to be forty-three dollars and eighty-nine cents ($43.89), due from defendant to claimant.

The declaration is properly verified and in due form, and supported by the evidence, all of which the State admits to be true.

The claim is allowed and claimant awarded the sum of forty-three dollars and eighty-nine cents ($43.89).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The claimant, at the request of the State of Illinois, requested claimant to furnish Fideliey Bonds to cover certain employees in the State Grain Inspection Department, named in the-declaration, which it did.

The proper charges for services are particularly itemized with the numbers of the policies and premiums due for each, showing a total amount of earned premiums by cancellation to be forty-three dollars and eighty-nine cents ($43.89), due from defendant to claimant.

The declaration is properly verified and in due form, and supported by the evidence, all of which the State admits to be true.

The claim is allowed and claimant awarded the sum of forty-three dollars and eighty-nine cents ($43.89).

O. W. Hunkle & Co. v. State, 4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 15, 1918 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 8 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1918).

Pincite

4 Ill. Ct. Cl. 15 (O. W. Hunkle & Co. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.