O. J. Gude Co. v. Murphy
129 A.D. 266, 113 N.Y.S. 860, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1276
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 1908·Published
Opinion
For the reasons stated in People ex rel. Wineburgh Advertising Co. v. Murphy (129 App. Div. 260), decided herewith, the order appealed from must be reversed and the motion for a peremptory mandamus granted.
Patterson, P. J., and Ingraham, J., concurred; Laughlin, J., concurred for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in City of New York v. Wineburgh Advertising Co., No. 4 (124 App. Div. 641); Clarke, J., dissented.
Order reversed, and motion for peremptory mandamus granted. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O. J. Gude Co. v. Murphy, 129 A.D. 266, 113 N.Y.S. 860, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).
129 A.D. 266 (O. J. Gude Co. v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of New York v. M. Wineburgh Advertising Co.
124 A.D. 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
People ex rel. M. Wineburgh Advertising Co. v. Murphy
129 A.D. 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)