O. D. Bratton v. United States

230 F.2d 952, 49 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 386, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 5288
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 2, 1956·No. 12548·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;

On consideration whereof, it appearing that the findings of fact of the District Court are supported by the record and that the applicable statutes were correctly applied, Lazier v. United States, 8 Cir., 170 F.2d 521; Smith v. United States, D.C., 85 F.Supp. 838, affirmed 6 Cir., 180 F.2d 357. Cf. Stephenson v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 101 F.2d 33, cer-tiorari denied 307 U.S. 647, 59 S.Ct. 1046, 83 L.Ed. 1527.

And no reversible error appearing in the record:

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O. D. Bratton v. United States, 230 F.2d 952, 49 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 386, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 5288 (6th Cir. 1956).

230 F.2d 952 (O. D. Bratton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. United States
213 F. Supp. 27 (W.D. Missouri, 1963)
CLuck v. Commissioner
29 T.C. 7 (U.S. Tax Court, 1957)