O. C. Hanson & Sons v. Beaulieu
This text of 181 N.W. 321 (O. C. Hanson & Sons v. Beaulieu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was before the court on a former appeal. 145 Minn. 119, 176 [478]*478N. W. 178. Reference may be bad to the opinion there rendered for a statement of the facts involved in the action and the legal rights of the parties arising therefrom. On the remand of the cause there was a trial of the action and the evidence and facts then presented are the same in all substantial respects as presented in the former record. The decision rendered on the other appeal therefore constitutes the law of the case and must be followed and applied. Orr v. Sutton, 127 Minn. 37, 148 N. W. 1066; Street v. Chicago, M. & St P. Ry. Co. 130 Minn. 246, 247, 153 N. W. 518; 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. and 1916 Supp. 398. note 30. The record presents no reversible error, and the judgment appealed from will be and is in all things affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 N.W. 321, 148 Minn. 477, 1921 Minn. LEXIS 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/o-c-hanson-sons-v-beaulieu-minn-1921.