Nyro Frederick v. State

155 So. 3d 1253
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 2015·No. 4D14-3223·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

NYRO FREDERICK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-3223

[January 28, 2015]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; David F. Crow, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2007-CF-017335-AXXX-MB.

Nyro Frederick, Century, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Defendant’s claim that his consecutive minimum mandatory sentences are illegal because they arose from the same criminal episode is rejected for the reasons stated in Williams v. State, 125 So. 3d 879 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (en banc).

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nyro Frederick v. State, 155 So. 3d 1253 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

155 So. 3d 1253 (Nyro Frederick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
125 So. 3d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)