Nyro Frederick v. State

155 So. 3d 1253
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 2015
Docket4D14-3223
StatusPublished

This text of 155 So. 3d 1253 (Nyro Frederick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nyro Frederick v. State, 155 So. 3d 1253 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

NYRO FREDERICK, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D14-3223

[January 28, 2015]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; David F. Crow, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2007-CF-017335-AXXX-MB.

Nyro Frederick, Century, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Defendant’s claim that his consecutive minimum mandatory sentences are illegal because they arose from the same criminal episode is rejected for the reasons stated in Williams v. State, 125 So. 3d 879 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (en banc).

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
125 So. 3d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 So. 3d 1253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyro-frederick-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.