Nyland v. . the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.

119 N.E. 1062, 223 N.Y. 652, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1357
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 23, 1918
StatusPublished

This text of 119 N.E. 1062 (Nyland v. . the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nyland v. . the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co., 119 N.E. 1062, 223 N.Y. 652, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1357 (N.Y. 1918).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

*653 Concur: Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. McLaughlin, J., dissents on the ground that the uncontradicted evidence shows that the plaintiff’s intestate was guilty of contributory negligence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 N.E. 1062, 223 N.Y. 652, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyland-v-the-new-york-central-and-hudson-river-rd-co-ny-1918.