Nyland v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

175 A.D. 965, 161 N.Y.S. 1137

This text of 175 A.D. 965 (Nyland v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nyland v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 175 A.D. 965, 161 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Merrell and De Angelis, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that it affirmatively appears that plaintiff's intestate was guilty of contributory negligence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 A.D. 965, 161 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyland-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1916.