Nygren v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
90 A. 1111, 86 N.J.L. 364, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 271
Opinion
This ease is controlled by the views expressed in the case of Webster v. Freeholders, at the present term, ante p. 256.
For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the present judgment will'be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Rone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nygren v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 90 A. 1111, 86 N.J.L. 364, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 271 (N.J. 1914).
90 A. 1111 (Nygren v. Board of Chosen Freeholders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.