Nyentcho v. Gonzales

234 F. App'x 59
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2007·No. No. 06-2257·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Nyentcho, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006); Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 744 (4th Cir.2006), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1147, 166 L.Ed.2d 997 (2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Nyentcho, No. A97-924-954 (B.I.A. Nov. 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nyentcho v. Gonzales, 234 F. App'x 59 (4th Cir. 2007).

234 F. App'x 59 (Nyentcho v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. United States
127 S. Ct. 1169 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Smith v. Nicholson
127 S. Ct. 1147 (Supreme Court, 2007)