Nydia De La Garza v. the Home Care Team Inc., and Maria Patricia Solis

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 17, 2015·No. 13-15-00571-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 13-15-00571-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS 12/17/2015 4:02:23 PM CORPUS CHRISTI Dorian E. Ramirez CLERK 12/17/15 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ, CLERK BY scarranza CASE NO. 13-15-00571-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRTEENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS

NYDIA DE LA GARZA APPELLANT

MARIA PATRICIA SOLIS APPELLEE

BRIEF OF APPELLANT

HAROLD K. TUMMEL SBN 20286675 LYDIA CASSO TUMMEL SBN 00791830 Tummel & Casso 4430 South McColl Road McAllen, Texas 78504 Tel. No.: (956) 664-2222 Fax No.: (956) 664-0522

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT

Page 1 of 11 IDENTITIES OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL

IDENTITIES OF PARTIES IDENTITIES OF COUNSEL Nydia De La Garza Harold K. Tummel *, ** Plaintiff, Appellant State Bar No. 20286675 S.D. Tex. No. 11901 tummel@bizrgv.rr.com Lydia Casso Tummel *, ** State Bar No. 00791830 S.D. Tex. No. 18782 lct@bizrgv.rr.com Tummel & Casso McColl At Trenton 4430 South McColl Road Edinburg, Texas 78539 956-664-2222 (Tel.) 956-664-0522 (Fax) Maria Patricia Solis Mr. Robert Garza * Defendant, Appellee State Bar No. jrobert@rgarzalaw.com Mr. Myles R. Garza State Bar No. myles@rgarzalaw.com Law Office of Robert Garza, P.C. 1200 E. Harrison St. Brownsville, Texas 78520 956-544-1111 (Tel.)

* Trial Counsel ** Appellate Counsel

Page 2 of 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESCRIPTION PAGES IDENTITIES OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES 4 STATEMENT OF THE CASE 5 ISSUES PRESENTED 5 STATEMENT OF FACTS 5 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT 8 ARGUMENT 8 PRAYER 10 TRAP 9.4(i)(3) CERTIFICATE 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 11 APPENDIX 1: ORDER OF DISMISSAL APPENDIX 2: TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE CHAPTER 74 EXCERPTS

Page 3 of 11 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

STATUTES AND CODES Tex. Civ. Prac. & Remedies Code Section 74.001 .........................................9 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Remedies Code Section 74.001(12) .................................9 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Remedies Code Section 74.001(13) .................................9 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Remedies Code Section 74.001(23) ................................9 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Remedies Code Section 74.351 ...........................5, 7, 8, 9 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Remedies Code Section 74.351(a).....................................8

Page 4 of 11 STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant Nydia De La Garza (“Plaintiff”) appeals from a dismissal of

her personal injury claims against Appellee Maria Patricia Solis (“Defendant”),

for failure to produce an expert report of the kind described in Texas Civil

Practice & Remedies Code (“TCPRC”) Section 74.351. (CR 13-23)

ISSUE PRESENTED

1. Did the trial court err in dismissing Plaintiff’s claims for failure to

produce a report of the kind described in TCPRC Section 74.351?

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiff was employed by The Home Care Team, Inc. (“THCT”), to

work as a home healthcare services provider. As part of Plaintiff’s job duties,

Plaintiff would travel to and from the homes of various customers of THCT,

to which Plaintiff was assigned. As part of Plaintiff’s job duties, Plaintiff

would move trash to trash collection containers for collection by private or

public waste management organizations with whom such customers contracted.

(CR 13-14)

On or about 11-10-13, and while engaged in her employment by THCT,

Plaintiff sustained bodily injuries when she fell upon a hazardous inclined

Page 5 of 11 walkway upon premises owned and controlled by Defendant, which were

located at 1723-1725 East Taylor Street, Brownsville, Texas 78520. (CR 14)

On the occasion in question, Plaintiff was required to walk up and down

a ramp outside the home upon said premises, in order to place trash in a trash

collection container. On the occasion in question, the ramp was wet, slippery

and unsafe for Plaintiff to walk upon. On the occasion in question, the ramp

was not equipped with handrails, or other such safety devices. On the occasion

in question, Plaintiff slipped and fell while walking on the ramp due to its wet,

slippery and unsafe condition. On the occasion in question, Plaintiff sustained

serious bodily injuries when she slipped and fell while walking on the ramp.

(CR 14-15)

Plaintiff contends that on the occasion in question, Defendant committed

various acts and/or omissions of negligence and gross negligence, which

included: failing properly to inspect the condition of the subject premises;

failing properly to make the subject premises reasonably safe for invitees;

failing properly to repair or replace the carpet installed upon said ramp; failing

properly to make said ramp reasonably safe when wet for invitees to walk

upon; and failing properly to install handrails or other such safety devices as

Page 6 of 11 would reasonably protect invitees walking upon said ramp against the risk of

falling. Plaintiff further contends that said acts and/or omissions of negligence

and gross negligence committed by Defendant on the occasion in question

proximately caused Plaintiff’s subject slip/fall and Plaintiff’s damages made

subjects of this case. (CR 15)

Plaintiff further contends that as proximate results of the negligence and

gross negligence of Defendant, Plaintiff sustained past and probable future

physical pain, past and probable future physical impairment, past and probable

future mental anguish, past and probable future medical care expenses, past

and probable future loss of earning capacity, and past and probable future loss

of services. (CR 15)

Plaintiff sued Defendant in the case at bar on 5-16-14. On 5-28-14,

Defendant filed her original answer. (CR 4-6) On 8-12-15, Defendant filed

her motion (“Defendant’s Motion”) to dismiss for failure to produce an expert

report pursuant to TCPRC Section 74.351. (CR 7-9) On 8-27-15, Plaintiff

filed her response (“Plaintiff’s Response”) to Defendant’s Motion. (CR 10-12)

On 10-20-15, Plaintiff filed her twelfth amended original petition. (CR 13-21)

On 11-12-15, the Court heard Defendant’s Motion. (CR 24) By order dated

Page 7 of 11 11-25-15, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion. (CR 22-23)

On 12-1-15, Plaintiff filed her notice of appeal from said order of

dismissal. (CR 25-28)

SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT

Because Defendant is not a health care provider or physician, Plaintiff’s

claims against Defendant are not health care liability claims. Therefore,

Plaintiff owed no duty to Defendant to produce an expert report pursuant to

TCPRC Section 74.351.

ARGUMENT

Issue 1

Did the trial Court err in dismissing Plaintiff’s claims for failure to

produce a report of the kind described in TCPRC Section 74.351?

In a health care liability claim, a claimant shall, not later than the 120th

day after the date each defendant’s original answer is filed, serve on that party

or the party’s attorney one or more expert reports, with a curriculum vitae of

each expert listed in the report for each physician or health care provider

against whom a liability claim is asserted. TCPRC Section 74.351(a).

A health care liability claim means a cause of action against a health

Page 8 of 11 care provider or physician for treatment, lack of treatment, or other claimed

departure from accepted standards of medical care, or health care, or safety or

professional or administrative services directly related to health care, which

proximately results in injury to or death of a claimant, whether the claimant’s

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nydia De La Garza v. the Home Care Team Inc., and Maria Patricia Solis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Nydia De La Garza v. the Home Care Team Inc., and Maria Patricia Solis (Nydia De La Garza v. the Home Care Team Inc., and Maria Patricia Solis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lezlea Ross v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
462 S.W.3d 496 (Texas Supreme Court, 2015)