NYCTL 2008-A Trust v. Lee Zhen Xiang

121 A.D.3d 1062, 995 N.Y.S.2d 197
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 29, 2014
Docket2013-01159
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 121 A.D.3d 1062 (NYCTL 2008-A Trust v. Lee Zhen Xiang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NYCTL 2008-A Trust v. Lee Zhen Xiang, 121 A.D.3d 1062, 995 N.Y.S.2d 197 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

*1063 In an action to foreclose on a real property tax lien, the defendants Lee Zhen Xiang and Bi Rong Lin appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated November 16, 2012, as, upon a decision of the same court dated May 30, 2012, granted those branches of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint, to strike their affirmative defenses, and to appoint a referee to compute the total sums due and owing to the plaintiffs, and denied those branches of their motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and reducing the amount of the tax lien.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In this action to foreclose a real property tax lien, the plaintiffs made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting proof that the appellants made no payments on the tax lien (see NYCTL 2009-A Trust v Tsafatinos, 101 AD3d 1092, 1093 [2012]; NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v Orit Diagnostic Ctr., Inc., 19 AD3d 668 [2005]; NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v Westmoreland Assoc., 2 AD3d 811, 812 [2003]). Even considering the unpleaded defenses the appellants advanced in opposition to the plaintiffs’ cross motion, the appellants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit.

Mastro, J.E, Sgroi, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

NYCTL Brownfield, LLC v. Scerbo
2021 NY Slip Op 06851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
NYCTL 2011-A Trust v. Evelyn
2019 NY Slip Op 6610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
NYCTL 2009-A Trust v. Morris
2018 NY Slip Op 6022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v. 104-26 Jamaica Ave, LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 2796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
NYCTL 2011-A Trust v. Master Sheet Co., Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 3525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
NYCTL 2008-A Trust v. Trinco, Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 2047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
NYCTL 1997-1 Trust v. Denis
2017 NY Slip Op 1217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 A.D.3d 1062, 995 N.Y.S.2d 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyctl-2008-a-trust-v-lee-zhen-xiang-nyappdiv-2014.