NYCTL 2004-A Trust v. Faysal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

NYCTL 2004-A Trust v. Faysal

62 A.D.3d 409, 877 N.Y.S.2d 686

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 A.D.3d 409 (NYCTL 2004-A Trust v. Faysal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NYCTL 2004-A Trust v. Faysal, 62 A.D.3d 409, 877 N.Y.S.2d 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R.Silver, J.), entered September 19, 2008, which denied defendant Masjid-Al Faysal’s motion to vacate the default judgment of foreclosure and sale of its property and to enjoin or annul the delivery of the deed to the purchaser, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiffs failed to properly serve defendant, a corporation (see CPLR 311 [a] [1]; Business Corporation Law § 306 [b]; Gouiran Family Trust v Gouiran, 40 AD3d 400, 401 [2007] [“CPLR 308 (5) provides for special service upon natural persons only”]). Accordingly, the judgment must be vacated and the action dismissed (CPLR 5015 [a] [4]; Security Pac. Natl. Trust [N.Y.] v Chunassamy, 289 AD2d 151 [2001]; Resolution Trust Corp. v Beck, 243 AD2d 307 [1997]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Buckley, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R.Silver, J.), entered September 19, 2008, which denied defendant Masjid-Al Faysal’s motion to vacate the default judgment of foreclosure and sale of its property and to enjoin or annul the delivery of the deed to the purchaser, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiffs failed to properly serve defendant, a corporation (see CPLR 311 [a] [1]; Business Corporation Law § 306 [b]; Gouiran Family Trust v Gouiran, 40 AD3d 400, 401 [2007] [“CPLR 308 (5) provides for special service upon natural persons only”]). Accordingly, the judgment must be vacated and the action dismissed (CPLR 5015 [a] [4]; Security Pac. Natl. Trust [N.Y.] v Chunassamy, 289 AD2d 151 [2001]; Resolution Trust Corp. v Beck, 243 AD2d 307 [1997]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Buckley, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.3d 409, 877 N.Y.S.2d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyctl-2004-a-trust-v-faysal-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack