NYCTL 1997-1 Trust v. Mehmetaj Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

NYCTL 1997-1 Trust v. Mehmetaj Realty Corp.

22 A.D.3d 545, 801 N.Y.S.2d 762

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.3d 545 (NYCTL 1997-1 Trust v. Mehmetaj Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NYCTL 1997-1 Trust v. Mehmetaj Realty Corp., 22 A.D.3d 545, 801 N.Y.S.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a tax lien, the defendant Mehmetaj Realty Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated November 17, 2003, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 317 and 5015 (a) (1) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated July 23, 2001, entered upon its default in appearing or answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendant Mehmetaj Realty Corp. pursuant to CPLR 317 and 5015 (a) (1) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale, entered upon its default in appearing or answering the complaint. Florio, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a tax lien, the defendant Mehmetaj Realty Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated November 17, 2003, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 317 and 5015 (a) (1) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated July 23, 2001, entered upon its default in appearing or answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendant Mehmetaj Realty Corp. pursuant to CPLR 317 and 5015 (a) (1) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale, entered upon its default in appearing or answering the complaint. Florio, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.3d 545, 801 N.Y.S.2d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyctl-1997-1-trust-v-mehmetaj-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2005.