NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. Guthartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. Guthartz

293 A.D.2d 455, 739 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3332

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 293 A.D.2d 455 (NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. Guthartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. Guthartz, 293 A.D.2d 455, 739 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a [456]*456strict foreclosure action pursuant to article 15 of the RPAPL, the defendant Alan Guthartz appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated September 11, 2000, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the plaintiffs were entitled to commence a strict foreclosure action against him even though they failed to join him as a defendant in the original foreclosure action (see 6820 Ridge Realty v Goldman, 263 AD2d 22). Further, the plaintiffs had standing to commence the action. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a [456]*456strict foreclosure action pursuant to article 15 of the RPAPL, the defendant Alan Guthartz appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated September 11, 2000, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the plaintiffs were entitled to commence a strict foreclosure action against him even though they failed to join him as a defendant in the original foreclosure action (see 6820 Ridge Realty v Goldman, 263 AD2d 22). Further, the plaintiffs had standing to commence the action. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 A.D.2d 455, 739 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyctl-1996-1-trust-v-guthartz-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack