N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . Brockway B. Co.

53 N.E. 209, 158 N.Y. 470, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 698
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 24, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 N.E. 209 (N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . Brockway B. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . Brockway B. Co., 53 N.E. 209, 158 N.Y. 470, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 698 (N.Y. 1899).

Opinion

This action was in ejectment to recover land in Dutchess county, near Fishkill Landing.

The plaintiff, in order to establish its cause of action, offered in evidence a certified copy of a record of letters patent from the People of the state of New York to the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, dated December 26, 1873, being a record in the office of the secretary of state. The defendant's counsel objected to the paper offered as incompetent and immaterial upon various grounds stated, among which are the grounds that there is no provision of *Page 472 law authorizing the recording of letters patent in the office of the secretary of state, and there is no provision of law for offering in evidence anything other than the original patent, nor any provision of law for reading in evidence the original record of any such letters patent, or any certified copy of such record. The objections were overruled and the certified copy of the record of letters patent was admitted in evidence, to which the defendant took an exception.

The only question which we feel called upon to discuss in this case is that pertaining to the competency of the certified copy of the record of the patent in the office of the secretary of state. It is contended that the paper in question is not evidence, for the reason that there is no law authorizing a record of patents in the office of the secretary of state. The question raised is one of considerable importance, in view of the fact that if the appellant is correct, many titles to real estate may be seriously affected. We have, therefore, made a careful examination of the statutes for the purpose of determining the question.

The office of secretary was established in 1625, and has been continued under various names until the present time. Under the government of the province of New Netherlands he was known as secretary of the province. Under the English colonial government he was known as the secretary of the colony. And under the state government he is called secretary of state. The office was made the depository of such books as contained records of patents, grants and conveyances, together with deeds, parchments, maps and papers (1 R.S. 166, § 1.) Upon the transfer of the government from the Dutch to the English, the records, files and documents of the office were passed over to the custody of the secretary of the colony, and upon the termination of that government they passed into the custody and control of the secretary of state, and now form a part of the records, files and public documents in that office.

When the government was transferred from the Dutch to the English in 1664, it was provided in the articles of capitulation that "the Dutch here shall enjoy their own customs *Page 473 concerning their inheritances and all public writings and records which concern the inheritances of any people or the reglement of the church, or poor, or orphans, shall be carefully kept by those in whose hands now they are and such writings as particularly concern the States General, may at any time be sent to them." (Appendix No. 1, 2 R.L. 1813.)

Under our first Constitution the office of secretary was not specifically mentioned, but it was continued and was not abolished. It provided that "all officers other than those who, by this constitution are directed to be otherwise appointed, shall be appointed in the manner following." It then proceeds to specify the manner in which appointments shall be made, and then provided that such parts of the common law of England and of the statute law of England and Great Britain and of the acts of the legislature of the colony of New York as formed the law of the colony on the 19th day of April, 1775, were continued the law of the state, subject to such alterations as the legislature shall, from time to time, make, and all grants of lands within the state made by the king of Great Britain, or persons acting under his authority prior to the 14th day of October, 1775, were continued in force. (Const. 1777, §§ 23, 35, 37.) Under the Constitution of 1821, the secretary of state was made a constitutional officer, appointed by the senate and assembly, and under the Constitution of 1846 the office was made elective by the people.

By chapter 12 of the Laws of 1784 the office of the secretary of state was located in the city of New York, in a house owned by the state, on the west side of Broadway, where the archives and records of this state were required to be deposited.

By chapter 48 of the Laws of 1791 a fireproof building was authorized to be erected in the city of Albany for the purpose of the preservation and safe keeping of the records of this state and for the transacting the business of the office of the said secretary, and by chapter 31 of the Laws of 1797 it was provided that as soon as the building is completed and fit for the reception of the records, books, papers and other things *Page 474 attached to, or in any wise relating or belonging to the offices aforesaid, the said secretary be required to remove and deposit the same in such building accordingly, and the said office from and after the removal aforesaid shall be kept in the building aforesaid.

We have called attention to the foregoing laws for the purpose of showing that the secretary of state is the successor of the secretary of the colony, and that the acts to which we shall subsequently refer authorized the recording of patents in the secretary's office.

Section 933 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that "a copy of a paper filed, kept, entered, or recorded, pursuant to law, in a public office of the state, the officer having charge of which has, pursuant to law, an official seal; * * * or a transcript from a record, kept, pursuant to law, in such a public office, or by such a clerk or secretary, is evidence, as if the original was produced."

Upon referring to the Colonial Laws (Vol. 1, p. 31), we find that the Duke of York's laws, promulgated by Governor Nicolls under date of March 1st, 1664, provide that every clerk of every court of sessions shall enter all grants, bargains, sales and mortgages of houses, lands, rents and hereditaments, together with the estates of the grantor and grantee, things and estates granted, together with the date thereof. Upon page 62 it is provided that "all records of bargains and sales, or any other conveyances, administrations or probates of wills within the north and west riding, shall be transmitted to the office at New York, with the fees ordained for the records, within one month after the record shall be made in the courts; if in the east riding, within two months." Upon page 77 it is further provided that "all lands, patents and bounds, and limits of towns are to be recorded in the office of records at New York, as well as in each particular town, and at the sessions."

By chapter 15 of the Laws of 1683, provision was made for the recording of grants, deeds, mortgages and other conveyances in the register of the county where the lands are situated, *Page 475 and also that "the said deeds, mortgages or other conveyances as aforesaid bee by the clerk or register of the county where such deeds, mortgages or other conveyances are entered, transmitted once every yeare to the secretary's office att New Yorke, with the ffees ordained for the same there to be registered and entered."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hooper v. City of New York
96 Misc. 47 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 N.E. 209, 158 N.Y. 470, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyc-hrrr-co-v-brockway-b-co-ny-1899.