Nyadzi v. Ki Chul Lee
This text of 129 A.D.3d 645 (Nyadzi v. Ki Chul Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered December 4, 2014, which denied plaintiff’s motion to strike the answer of defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to strike the answer of defendants, as there was no discovery violation (see CPLR 3126; Fish & Richardson, P.C. v Schindler, 75 AD3d 219, 220 [1st Dept 2010]). The court’s (Laura Douglas, J.), order entered August 14, 2014, which is not on appeal here, directed defendants to produce “Mr. Roderick Roberts on behalf of defendant Ki Chul Lee,” and superseded the two prior conference orders directing “all parties” to appear for depositions. Defendants complied with the order entered August 14, 2014. Further, defense counsel acted properly during the deposition of defendant 3420 Boston Road Corp.’s owner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D.3d 645, 10 N.Y.S.3d 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nyadzi-v-ki-chul-lee-nyappdiv-2015.