NWE Corp. v. Atomic Risk Management of New York, Inc.

47 A.D.3d 488, 848 N.Y.S.2d 878

This text of 47 A.D.3d 488 (NWE Corp. v. Atomic Risk Management of New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NWE Corp. v. Atomic Risk Management of New York, Inc., 47 A.D.3d 488, 848 N.Y.S.2d 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered on or about April 13, 2007, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs failed to raise an inference either that they specifically requested greater coverage than that obtained by defendants or that their relationship with defendants imposed on the latter a duty to advise them to obtain additional coverage (see Hoffend & Sons, Inc. v Rose & Kiernan, Inc., 7 NY3d 152 [2006]).

Plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are unavailing. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoffend & Sons, Inc. v. Rose & Kiernan, Inc.
851 N.E.2d 1149 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.D.3d 488, 848 N.Y.S.2d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nwe-corp-v-atomic-risk-management-of-new-york-inc-nyappdiv-2008.