Nwankwo v. Warden, LSCI Butner

25 F. App'x 208
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 29, 2002·No. 01-6601·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Francis Nwankwo appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Nwankwo v. Warden, No. CA-00-831 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2001); see United States v. White, 238 F.3d 537, 542-43 (4th Cir.) (holding that when there are multiple counts of conviction, statutory maximum sentence on each count may be aggregated to reach the appropriate sentence within the applicable guidelines range), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 2235, 150 L.Ed.2d 225 (2001); In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 329-30 (4th Cir.2000) (explaining applicability of savings clause in 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nwankwo v. Warden, LSCI Butner, 25 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2002).

25 F. App'x 208 (Nwankwo v. Warden, LSCI Butner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Christopher White
238 F.3d 537 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
Cruz v. United States
532 U.S. 1074 (Supreme Court, 2001)