N.W. v. State
137 So. 3d 1124, 2014 WL 1257524, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4404
Opinion
Affirmed. See I.R. v. State, 385 So.2d 686, 687-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (“Where the evidence is in conflict, it is within the province of the trier of fact to assess the credibility of witnesses, and upon evaluating the testimony, rely upon the testimony found by it to be worthy of belief and reject such testimony found by it to be untrue.... The testimony of a single witness, even if uncorroborated and contradicted by other State witnesses, is sufficient to sustain a conviction.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
N.W. v. State, 137 So. 3d 1124, 2014 WL 1257524, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4404 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
137 So. 3d 1124 (N.W. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
I.R. v. State
385 So. 2d 686 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)