N.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

N.W. v. State

137 So. 3d 1124, 2014 WL 1257524, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4404

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 2014

DocketNo. 3D13-1877

StatusPublished

This text of 137 So. 3d 1124 (N.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.W. v. State, 137 So. 3d 1124, 2014 WL 1257524, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4404 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See I.R. v. State, 385 So.2d 686, 687-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (“Where the evidence is in conflict, it is within the province of the trier of fact to assess the credibility of witnesses, and upon evaluating the testimony, rely upon the testimony found by it to be worthy of belief and reject such testimony found by it to be untrue.... The testimony of a single witness, even if uncorroborated and contradicted by other State witnesses, is sufficient to sustain a conviction.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See I.R. v. State, 385 So.2d 686, 687-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (“Where the evidence is in conflict, it is within the province of the trier of fact to assess the credibility of witnesses, and upon evaluating the testimony, rely upon the testimony found by it to be worthy of belief and reject such testimony found by it to be untrue.... The testimony of a single witness, even if uncorroborated and contradicted by other State witnesses, is sufficient to sustain a conviction.”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 So. 3d 1124, 2014 WL 1257524, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nw-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack