N.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

N.W. v. State

835 So. 2d 1263, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 945

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 3, 2003

DocketNo. 1D01-5187

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 835 So. 2d 1263 (N.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N.W. v. State, 835 So. 2d 1263, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 945 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See J.J.T. v. State, 810 So.2d 548, 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (“Below, J.J.T. did not object to the trial court’s failure to provide reasons for the deviation from the DJJ recommendation. Further, J.J.T. made no legal argument to the trial court which would have presented to the court the statutory requirement for stating reasons for the deviation. Accordingly, we hold that J.J.T. has failed to preserve the error asserted on appeal.” (citations omitted)); cf. E.S.B. v. State, [1264]*1264822 So.2d 579, 580 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (“A juvenile appealing and claiming that the trial court erred in deviating from the disposition recommended by the DJJ must preserve that issue for appellate review. Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.135(b)(2) was recently amended to provide the same procedural safeguards as Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). Appellant’s utilization of rule 8.135(b)(2) preserved this issue for appellate review.” (citations omitted)).

KAHN and LEWIS, JJ., concur. BENTON, J., dissents w/ opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See J.J.T. v. State, 810 So.2d 548, 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (“Below, J.J.T. did not object to the trial court’s failure to provide reasons for the deviation from the DJJ recommendation. Further, J.J.T. made no legal argument to the trial court which would have presented to the court the statutory requirement for stating reasons for the deviation. Accordingly, we hold that J.J.T. has failed to preserve the error asserted on appeal.” (citations omitted)); cf. E.S.B. v. State, [1264]*1264822 So.2d 579, 580 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (“A juvenile appealing and claiming that the trial court erred in deviating from the disposition recommended by the DJJ must preserve that issue for appellate review. Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.135(b)(2) was recently amended to provide the same procedural safeguards as Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). Appellant’s utilization of rule 8.135(b)(2) preserved this issue for appellate review.” (citations omitted)).

KAHN and LEWIS, JJ., concur. BENTON, J., dissents w/ opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

835 So. 2d 1263, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nw-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack