N&W Construction Co. v. Roosa Family Associates, Ltd. Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

N&W Construction Co. v. Roosa Family Associates, Ltd. Partnership

70 A.D.3d 1375, 893 N.Y.S.2d 798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.3d 1375 (N&W Construction Co. v. Roosa Family Associates, Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N&W Construction Co. v. Roosa Family Associates, Ltd. Partnership, 70 A.D.3d 1375, 893 N.Y.S.2d 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered April 3, 2009 in an action for, inter alia, foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of plaintiff Brawdy Construction, Inc. for an extension of the notice of pendency and granted the cross motion of defendants Roosa Family Associates, Limited Partnership, Joseph B. Roosa, individually, and Northwest Savings Bank to vacate the mechanic’s lien of that plaintiff.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Fahey and Lindley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered April 3, 2009 in an action for, inter alia, foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of plaintiff Brawdy Construction, Inc. for an extension of the notice of pendency and granted the cross motion of defendants Roosa Family Associates, Limited Partnership, Joseph B. Roosa, individually, and Northwest Savings Bank to vacate the mechanic’s lien of that plaintiff.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Fahey and Lindley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.3d 1375, 893 N.Y.S.2d 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nw-construction-co-v-roosa-family-associates-ltd-partnership-nyappdiv-2010.