Nuzzo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nuzzo v. State

269 So. 2d 379

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 8, 1972

DocketNos. 71-906, 71-907

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 So. 2d 379 (Nuzzo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nuzzo v. State, 269 So. 2d 379 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to each of two informations and enter pleas of not guilty thereto.

Appellant proffered testimony to corroborate his allegations in the motion; however, the trial court denied the proffer and summarily denied the motion.

We hold that the appellant was entitled to an evidentiary hearing in view of the allegations of his motion which were in part corroborated by the proffered evidence.¹

Reversed and remanded.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur. McNULTY, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to each of two informations and enter pleas of not guilty thereto.

Appellant proffered testimony to corroborate his allegations in the motion; however, the trial court denied the proffer and summarily denied the motion.

We hold that the appellant was entitled to an evidentiary hearing in view of the allegations of his motion which were in part corroborated by the proffered evidence.¹

Reversed and remanded.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur. McNULTY, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 So. 2d 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nuzzo-v-state-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack