Nutting v. Higgins

121 So. 104, 97 Fla. 389
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 25, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby reversed upon authority of Fisher v. Miller, 92 Fla. 48, 109 So. R. 257; Bland v. Knoblock, 92 Fla. 254, 109 So. R. 415.

Reversed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nutting v. Higgins, 121 So. 104, 97 Fla. 389 (Fla. 1929).

121 So. 104 (Nutting v. Higgins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fisher v. Miller
109 So. 257 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Bland v. Knoblock
109 So. 415 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)