Nutter v. Nutter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nutter v. Nutter

909 So. 2d 925, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11816, 2005 WL 1787449

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 29, 2005

DocketNo. 5D04-3221

StatusPublished

This text of 909 So. 2d 925 (Nutter v. Nutter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nutter v. Nutter, 909 So. 2d 925, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11816, 2005 WL 1787449 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the Order of Clarification of Final Judgment because the Motion for Clarification, which is the equivalent of a motion for rehearing, Fuller v. Fuller, 706 So.2d 57, 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), was not timely filed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b) (Motions for rehearing are not timely filed unless they are served no later than 10 days after the date of the final judgment.).

REVERSED.

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the Order of Clarification of Final Judgment because the Motion for Clarification, which is the equivalent of a motion for rehearing, Fuller v. Fuller, 706 So.2d 57, 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), was not timely filed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b) (Motions for rehearing are not timely filed unless they are served no later than 10 days after the date of the final judgment.).

REVERSED.

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

909 So. 2d 925, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11816, 2005 WL 1787449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nutter-v-nutter-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack