Nutter v. Nutter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nutter v. Nutter

909 So. 2d 925, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11816, 2005 WL 1787449

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 2005·No. No. 5D04-3221·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the Order of Clarification of Final Judgment because the Motion for Clarification, which is the equivalent of a motion for rehearing, Fuller v. Fuller, 706 So.2d 57, 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), was not timely filed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b) (Motions for rehearing are not timely filed unless they are served no later than 10 days after the date of the final judgment.).

REVERSED.

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the Order of Clarification of Final Judgment because the Motion for Clarification, which is the equivalent of a motion for rehearing, Fuller v. Fuller, 706 So.2d 57, 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), was not timely filed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b) (Motions for rehearing are not timely filed unless they are served no later than 10 days after the date of the final judgment.).

REVERSED.

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Nutter v. Nutter, 909 So. 2d 925, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11816, 2005 WL 1787449 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

909 So. 2d 925 (Nutter v. Nutter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related