Nutt v. State

163 S.W.2d 197, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 583

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nutt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 Tex. Crim. 9 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 17, 1942·No. No. 22197·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for cattle theft, the punishment assessed being two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

[198]*198The record is before us without statement of facts or hills of exception. All matters of procedure appear regular. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial co'urt is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the ■ Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction is for cattle theft, the punishment assessed being two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

[198]*198The record is before us without statement of facts or hills of exception. All matters of procedure appear regular. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial co'urt is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the ■ Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Nutt v. State, 163 S.W.2d 197, 1942 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 583 (Tex. 1942).

Pincite

163 S.W.2d 197 (Nutt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.