Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc., Successor to Security v. Duvall

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky·Decided January 7, 2021·No. 20-01012·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION IN RE: ) ) JOSHUA DUVALL ) CASE NO.: 19-11272(1)(12) BRANDI DUVALL ) NATHAN DUVALL ) JAIME DUVALL ) Administratively Consolidated ) Debtor(s) ) ) NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC., ) AP NO. 20-1012 successor to SECURITY SEED AND ) CHEMICAL, INC. ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) JOSHUA LEE DUVALL, et al. ) ) Defendant(s) ) MEMORANDUM-OPINION

The following constitutes the Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with respect to the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc. Successor to Security Seed and Chemical, Inc. (“Nutrien”), Motion for Summary Judgment filed by South Central Bank, Inc. (“SCB”), Response to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Morgantown Bank & Trust Company (“MB&T”), and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Bank of Edmonson County (“BOEC”). FINDINGS OF FACT In the late 1990s, Nathan and Josh Duvall (collectively, the “Debtors”) began operating a farming partnership called “Duvall Farms.” This loose business arrangement involved sharing machinery and equipment.

The Debtors purchased farm machinery and equipment (hereinafter, “Equipment”) in their individual names. On January 1, 2019, the Debtors formed a new general partnership called “D&D Farms.” Although the Debtors claimed to transfer the ownership of their equipment to D&D Farms, there is no paperwork documenting the transfer, nor were the existing liens on the equipment released hereinafter referred to as the “alleged transfer”. To sustain their farming operations, the Debtors–either individually or collaboratively – sought and obtained financing from various lenders, including: (1) Nutrien, (2) SCB, (3) Simplot

AB Retail, Inc. (“Simplot”), MB&T, and BOEC. Pertinently: a. Nutrien. On July 11, 2017, the Debtors executed a Promissory Note in the principal amount up to $485,000.00, along with a Security Agreement, in favor of Nutrien.. On or about August 3, 2017 and August 4, 2017, Nutrien advanced loan funds in the total principal amount of $443,986.11. To secure the loan, the Debtors granted Nutrien a blanket lien in “[a]ll farm and business machinery, equipment and tools.” On March 3, 2016, Nutrien filed an initial financing statement naming “Nathan Wayne Duvall” as the debtor, and, on March 14, 2017, Nutrien amended the statement to add the following collateral description: “All farm and other equipment and inventory, now owned or hereafter acquired by debtor.” On April 15, 2013, Nutrien filed an initial financing statement naming “Joshua Lee Duvall” as the debtor, and, on June 30, 2017, Nutrien amended the statement to add the following collateral description: “All farm and business machinery, equipment and tools.” -2- b. SCB. On October 18, 2017, the Debtors executed two Promissory Notes in favor of SCB––one in the principal amount of $95,000.00, and the other in the principal amount of $595,000.00. To secure the $95,000.00 Note, the Debtors executed an Agricultural Security Agreement in favor of SCB, under which the Debtors granted SCB: (1) a blanket lien in “All of Debtor’s now owned or hereafter acquired and wherever located farm equipment,” and (2) a purchase-money security interest in Debtors’ 2014 ProForce 3430 Variable Rate Spreader. To secure the $595,000.00 Note, the Debtors granted SCB a mortgage on real property. Pursuant to the cross-collateralization clause set forth in the Agricultural Security Agreement, the Debtors agreed that SCB’s blanket lien on “farm equipment” secured the obligations owed under the $595,000.00 Promissory Note. On October 20, 2017, SCB filed a financing statement naming “Josh L. Duvall” as the debtor and describing the collateral as: “All of Debtor’s now owned and hereafter acquired whatever located farm equipment . . ..” On the same date, SCB filed a second financing statement against “Josh L. Duvall” listing the “2014 ProForce 34030 18ft Variable Rate Spreader, Model #TP-18 (Serial #10313) as collateral.” Likewise, on October 20, 2017, SCB filed a financing statement naming “Nathan W. Duvall” as the debtor and describing the collateral as: “All of Debtor’s now owned and hereafter acquired whatever located farm equipment . . ..” c. Simplot. On March 15, 2017, Josh Duvall submitted an “Application and Note/Security Agreement” in favor of Simplot, pursuant to which Simplot appears to have loaned Josh Duvall $230,760.15 in exchange for a security interest in Josh’s one-half share of the Equipment. On April 5, 2018, Simplot filed a financing statement naming “Joshua Lee Duvall” as the debtor and describing the collateral as: “All farm and business machinery, equipment and tools.” d. MB&T. On March 16, 2017, the Defendants, Josh Duvall and Brandi Duvall, entered into a Commercial Promissory Note (“Note”) with Morgantown Bank in the original principal amount of $58,359.00, as amended by an Extension Agreement dated March 16, 2018 and an Extension Agreement dated January 3, 2019. -3- The primary purpose of the Note was for the purchase of a Case 840L LGP Dozer, and the Note contained a security interest in same. On that same date, a loan proceeds check in the amount of $58,000.00, the net amount of the loan, was deposited in Duvall’s account. The purchase price of the Case 840L LGP Dozer was $56,000.00, as established by an invoice from Southern Equipment Sales & Rental, Inc. This invoice contained wiring instructions for payment of the purchase price. As evidenced by Duvall’s checking account statement dated March 20, 2017, the loan proceeds were deposited into Checking Account No. 430183801 on March 16, 2017, and on that same date, a wire out in the amount of $56,015.00 (the additional $15.00 being a wire transfer fee), was initiated to pay for the invoice of the purchase of the Case 840L LGP Dozer from Southern Equipment Sales & Rental, Inc. On March 20, 2017, Morgantown Bank filed a UCC-1 Financing Statement with the Kentucky Secretary of State (File No. 2017 – 2884454 – 95.01). The name of the Debtor contained in MB&T’s UCC-1 Financing Statement was “Josh Duvall.” As a result of a financing statement filed by The Peoples Bank on May 28, 2019, The Peoples Bank also claims a security interest in the Case 840L LGP Dozer, alleging that its interest has priority. Supra. A search of the Kentucky Secretary of State’s records, using the standard search logic using the Debtor’s name as required by KRS 355.9-503(d), Joshua Lee Duvall, does not disclose the UCC-1 Financing Statement filed by MB&T concerning the Case 840L LGP Dozer, nor does it disclose the UCC-1 Financing Statement filed by The People’s Bank on the Case 840L LGP Dozer. e. BOEC. On February 10, 2017, Josh Duvall executed a promissory note in favor of BOEC for the original principal amount of $125,116.28. To secure the promissory note, Josh and Nathan Duvall executed an Agricultural Security Agreement that same day whereby they granted BOEC a security interest in the following: (1) 2000 John Deere 6410 Tractor; (2) 2010 John Deere 9670 Combine; and (3) 2012 John Deere 4830 Sprayer. BOEC filed a UCC Financing Statement with the Kentucky Secretary of State’s Office on March 1, 2017 at 1:48:57 p.m., 2017-2881425-80.01. The financing statement identifies BOEC as the secured party and “Josh Duvall” and “Nathan Duvall” as the debtors. Although a representative of BOEC and The Peoples Bank exchanged emails regarding the possibility of BOEC subordinating its lien on the 3 pieces of -4- equipment to The Peoples Bank’s lien, no formal documents were ever executed between BOEC and The Peoples Bank.

f. Northland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc., Successor to Security v. Duvall, (Ky. 2021).

Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc., Successor to Security v. Duvall (Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc., Successor to Security v. Duvall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank of Grayson v. Citizens Deposit Bank & Bank
735 S.W.2d 328 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1987)