Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. F/K/A Crop Production Services, Inc. and Crop Production Services, Inc. v. Peter Balderas and Martha Balderas, Individually and on Behalf of Their Injured and Minor Children, P.B., Jr. and E.B., Injured Minors, and F.B., J.B., J.B., and Y.B., Minor Children, and Jacqueline Balderas, Individually, and Casandra Balderas, Individually
This text of Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. F/K/A Crop Production Services, Inc. and Crop Production Services, Inc. v. Peter Balderas and Martha Balderas, Individually and on Behalf of Their Injured and Minor Children, P.B., Jr. and E.B., Injured Minors, and F.B., J.B., J.B., and Y.B., Minor Children, and Jacqueline Balderas, Individually, and Casandra Balderas, Individually (Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. F/K/A Crop Production Services, Inc. and Crop Production Services, Inc. v. Peter Balderas and Martha Balderas, Individually and on Behalf of Their Injured and Minor Children, P.B., Jr. and E.B., Injured Minors, and F.B., J.B., J.B., and Y.B., Minor Children, and Jacqueline Balderas, Individually, and Casandra Balderas, Individually) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________
No. 07-20-00192-CV ________________________
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC. F/K/A CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC., AND CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC., PETITIONERS
V.
PETER BALDERAS AND MARTHA BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR INJURED AND DECEASED MINOR CHILDREN, P.B., JR. AND E.B., INJURED MINORS, AND F.B., J.B., J.B., AND Y.B., DECEASED MINOR CHILDREN, AND JACQUELINE BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND CASANDRA BALDERAS, INDIVIDUALLY, RESPONDENTS
On Petition for Permissive Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 106,846-E-CV; Honorable Doug Woodburn, Presiding
September 14, 2020
ORDER DENYING PERMISSIVE APPEAL
Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Pending before this court is the Petition for Interlocutory Appeal filed by Petitioners,
Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. (f/k/a Crop Production Services, Inc.) and Crop Production
Services, Inc., seeking permission to appeal the trial court’s Amended Order Denying Defendant Nutrien’s Amended No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment and
Amended Order Denying Defendant Nutrien’s Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment.
Respondents have filed an objection to the petition.
To be entitled to a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order not otherwise
appealable, the petitioner must establish that (1) the order appealed involves “a
controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of
opinion” and (2) immediate appeal from the order “may materially advance the ultimate
termination of the litigation.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d) (West Supp.
2019); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(e)(4). Because the petition fails to establish each of these
requirements, we deny the petition for permissive appeal.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. F/K/A Crop Production Services, Inc. and Crop Production Services, Inc. v. Peter Balderas and Martha Balderas, Individually and on Behalf of Their Injured and Minor Children, P.B., Jr. and E.B., Injured Minors, and F.B., J.B., J.B., and Y.B., Minor Children, and Jacqueline Balderas, Individually, and Casandra Balderas, Individually, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nutrien-ag-solutions-inc-fka-crop-production-services-inc-and-crop-texapp-2020.