Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Cyberzenn, LLC

Opinion

3 Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-01883-CDS-DJA 4 Plaintiffs Order Directing Entry of Default Judgment 5] _ v. Cyberzenn, LLC, et al. 7 Defendants 8 9 Plaintiffs Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences, 10] Inc. moved for default judgment against defendants Cyberzenn, LLC, Raychel Gonzalez, and 11] Darina Beckett because each defendant failed to plead or otherwise defend this matter. Mot. for 12] default j., ECF No. 15. The motion was set for hearing and Nutramax provided defendants notice of the hearing on April 18, 2024. Cert. of service, ECF No. 19. Defendants failed to appear at the 14] April 30, 2024, hearing. Mins. of proceedings, ECF No. 22. After considering Federal Rule of 15] Civil Procedure 55, the Eitel factors,! and with no opposition by the defendants, the court found 16 good cause to enter default judgment in favor of Nutramax. Order, ECF No. 23. This order, which merely instructs the clerk to enter judgment, is a supplement to the permanent injunction and default judgment order issued on May 9, 2024. 19 Conclusion 20 The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to enter default judgment against defendants Cyberzenn, LLC, Raychel Gonzalez, and Darina Beckett and in favor of plaintiffs Nutramax 22 Laboratories, Inc. and Nutramax Laboratories yeep Inc., and to close this case. 23 Dated: February 19, 2025 // eg — Cristina D. Silva 25 United States District Judge 26 (

Fitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986).