Nutley v. Metropolis Con. Co.

110 P. 331, 13 Cal. App. 588
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 13, 1910
DocketCiv. No. 752.
StatusPublished

This text of 110 P. 331 (Nutley v. Metropolis Con. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nutley v. Metropolis Con. Co., 110 P. 331, 13 Cal. App. 588 (Cal. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled action on the ground that no transcript of the record on appeal from the judgment in said action has been filed and more than forty days have elapsed since the perfection of such appeal.

With the exception as to the amount of the judgment recovered by plaintiff, the facts are the same as in Union Lumber Co. v.Metropolis Construction Co. (No. 751), ante, p. 584, [110 P. 329], in which a similar motion was this day decided.

Conformably with the decision in that case, the appeal is dismissed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred. *Page 589

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Lumber Co. v. Metropolis Construction Co.
110 P. 329 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 P. 331, 13 Cal. App. 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nutley-v-metropolis-con-co-calctapp-1910.