NuStar Energy, L.P., and Kaneb Management Company, L.L.C. v. Diamond Offshore Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 26, 2013
Docket14-12-00657-CV
StatusPublished

This text of NuStar Energy, L.P., and Kaneb Management Company, L.L.C. v. Diamond Offshore Company (NuStar Energy, L.P., and Kaneb Management Company, L.L.C. v. Diamond Offshore Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NuStar Energy, L.P., and Kaneb Management Company, L.L.C. v. Diamond Offshore Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Abatement Order filed February 26, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-12-00657-CV ____________

NUSTAR ENERGY, L.P., AND KANEB MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.L.C., Appellants

V.

DIAMOND OFFSHORE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-55475

ABATEMENT ORDER

This is an appeal from an amended judgment signed June 18, 2012. The judgment is not final.

The Texas Supreme Court has advised that if an appellate court is uncertain about the intent of an order to finally dispose of all claims and parties, it can abate the appeal to permit clarification by the trial court. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 206 (Tex. 2001). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 27.2 provides as follows:

The appellate court may allow an appealed order that is not final to be modified so as to be made final and may allow the modified order and all proceedings relating to it to be included in a supplemental record.

Tex. R. App. P. 27.2.

Accordingly, we order the case abated and remanded to the trial court for a period of thirty days so that the trial court may clarify whether the summary judgment is final and to permit the parties to obtain an order or orders disposing of the claims against Nustar Energy, L.P., if necessary. A supplemental clerk=s record containing the trial court=s clarifying order(s) shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or before March 28, 2013.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court=s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court=s active docket when the supplemental clerk=s record is filed in this court.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
NuStar Energy, L.P., and Kaneb Management Company, L.L.C. v. Diamond Offshore Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nustar-energy-lp-and-kaneb-management-company-llc--texapp-2013.