Nusbaum's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Nusbaum's Appeal

1 A. 392, 1 Sadler 109, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 623

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 19, 1885

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 A. 392 (Nusbaum's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nusbaum's Appeal, 1 A. 392, 1 Sadler 109, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 623 (Pa. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In the feigned issue framed to try the validity of the judgment on which the appellant claims, the jury found that the note on which the judgment was entered, was given with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the appellees. The auditor adopted that finding, and the court approved it. We have just affirmed that: judgment.

It follows that the judgments in favor of the appellees were-properly preferred in the distribution.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the cost of the appel-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

In the feigned issue framed to try the validity of the judgment on which the appellant claims, the jury found that the note on which the judgment was entered, was given with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the appellees. The auditor adopted that finding, and the court approved it. We have just affirmed that: judgment.

It follows that the judgments in favor of the appellees were-properly preferred in the distribution.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the cost of the appel-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A. 392, 1 Sadler 109, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nusbaums-appeal-pa-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack