Nusbaum's Appeal
1 A. 392, 1 Sadler 109, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 623
Opinion
In the feigned issue framed to try the validity of the judgment on which the appellant claims, the jury found that the note on which the judgment was entered, was given with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the appellees. The auditor adopted that finding, and the court approved it. We have just affirmed that: judgment.
It follows that the judgments in favor of the appellees were-properly preferred in the distribution.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the cost of the appel-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nusbaum's Appeal, 1 A. 392, 1 Sadler 109, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 623 (Pa. 1885).
1 A. 392 (Nusbaum's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Atwater v. American Exchange Nat. Bank
152 Ill. 605 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1894)