Nurture, LLC v. PBM Nutritionals LLC
Opinion
GreenbergTraurig
Richard A. Edlin Tel 212.801.6528 Fax 212.805.5528 EdlinR @gtlaw.com May 16, 2025 BY ECF AND EMAIL Honorable Katherine Polk Failla United States District Court MEMO ENDORSED Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, Room 2103 New York, New York 10007 Failla NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov Re: Nurture, LLC vy. PBM Nutritionals, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-02390-KPM — Joint Request for Temporary Stay and to Extend Deadlines Dear Judge Failla: Plaintiff Nurture, LLC (“Nurture”) and Defendant PBM Nutritionals, LLC (‘Perrigo”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, jointly request a temporary stay of the deadlines set forth in the Second Amended Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, entered on February 27, 2025 (Dkt. No. 64). This extension is sought to allow the Parties to explore a potential resolution of their dispute through private mediation. This is the Parties’ third request for an adjournment, and all prior requests have been granted. There is good cause for the requested relief. See L.N.K. Int’l, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co., No. 22-cv-05184, 2023 WL 2614211, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2023) (explaining that granting a temporary stay to allow the parties to pursue mediation advances Rule 1’s goal of ensuring the Rules promote a “just, speedy, and inexpensive” resolution of cases); see also Lazaar v. Anthem Co., Inc., No. 22-cv-3075, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123457, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. July 9, 2024) (granting joint request to stay proceedings pending mediation). With document discovery substantially complete and expert disclosures recently exchanged, the Parties recognize that continuing litigation will entail significant expenses. To promote judicial economy and conserve resources, the Parties have recently agreed to pursue private mediation. They have selected a mutually agreeable mediator and anticipate scheduling the mediation to occur the week of July 14, 2025. The goal of this mediation will be to reach a resolution of all claims, which the Parties would then jointly present to the Court for approval. The Parties believe a stay of upcoming discovery deadlines is essential to ensuring a productive mediation. The Parties anticipate expending significant resources in preparing for mediation and compiling the information necessary for the mediator to meaningfully evaluate the claims at issue. Reserving remaining fact and expert discovery until after mediation, if needed, will allow the Parties to limit their litigation expenses and concentrate their efforts on trying to Traurig, LLP | Attorneys at Law
Page 2 reach a resolution. A stay will also conserve judicial resources, as it will ensure the Court does not expend resources ruling on discovery motions where those disputes may be resolved through settlement. The Parties agree that their request is in the interest of both the Parties and the Court and does not cause prejudice to either side. Accordingly, should the case not resolve, the Parties agree that they will complete their fact witness depositions no later than October 17, 2025, i.e., approximately 90 days after the mediation. The Parties have attached a proposed Third Amended Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order reflecting the following amended deadlines: Description Current Deadline New Proposed Deadline Deadline to complete fact June 20, 2025 October 17, 2025 witness depositions Fact discovery deadline June 24, 2025 October 22, 2025 Deadline to serve Requests July 8, 2025 November 5, 2025 to Admit Plaintiff’s expert reports July 8, 2025 November 5, 2025 due Defendant’s expert reports August 12, 2025 December 10, 2025 due Deadline to respond to August 5, 2025 December 3, 2025 Requests to Admit Deadline to complete expert September 23, 2025 January 21, 2026 witness depositions Expert discovery deadline September 23, 2025 January 21, 2026 We appreciate the Court’s consideration of this request and are available should the Court have any questions. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Richard A. Edlin Richard A. Edlin cc: All counsel of record (via ECF) Given that the parties have agreed to engage in private mediation, which they anticipate will take place on July 14, 2025, the Court hereby STAYS the discovery deadlines in this action, pending further order of the Court. The Court has endorsed the parties' proposed amended case management plan under separate cover. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file a joint letter within one week of their private mediation informing the Court whether they have reached a resolution. The Court advises the parties that, given the stay and the substantial extension of the discovery deadlines, the Court will grant no further extension requests. The post-fact discovery conference currently scheduled for August 7, 2025, is hereby ADJOURNED to November 6, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 69. Dated: May 19, 2025 SO ORDERED. New York, New York
HON. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nurture, LLC v. PBM Nutritionals LLC (Nurture, LLC v. PBM Nutritionals LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.