Nurmi v. Handi-Man Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nurmi v. Handi-Man Co.

17 A.D.2d 953, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7238

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 5, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 953 (Nurmi v. Handi-Man Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nurmi v. Handi-Man Co., 17 A.D.2d 953, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by the plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of slipping on a waxed floor, and by her husband (the coplaintiff) to recover damages for loss of services and medical expenses, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 4, 1962, granting conditionally its motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution, as permitted plaintiffs to file a note of issue for a subsequent term of the court. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by the plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of slipping on a waxed floor, and by her husband (the coplaintiff) to recover damages for loss of services and medical expenses, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 4, 1962, granting conditionally its motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution, as permitted plaintiffs to file a note of issue for a subsequent term of the court. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 953, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nurmi-v-handi-man-co-nyappdiv-1962.