Nurdlinger v. Irvine ex rel. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Nurdlinger v. Irvine ex rel. Commonwealth

4 A. 166, 2 Sadler 235

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 12, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 A. 166 (Nurdlinger v. Irvine ex rel. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nurdlinger v. Irvine ex rel. Commonwealth, 4 A. 166, 2 Sadler 235 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

These three cases were argued together. The main question therein is common to all of them.

We concur in the construction put upon the statute relating to the time for which the licenses were authorized to be granted. It would be a forced interpretation to hold that they were to be effective for more than one year, or at more than, one place in the county.

The payment of a fine for a violation of the law is no legal bar to the right of the treasurer to collect the license fees.

Judgment affirmed in each case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI