Nunzio Orsini v. Italian Line, Italia Societa Per Azioni Di Navigazione Sede in Genova

Third Circuit

Nunzio Orsini v. Italian Line, Italia Societa Per Azioni Di Navigazione Sede in Genova

358 F.2d 735, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6834

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 17, 1966

Docket15499_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 358 F.2d 735 (Nunzio Orsini v. Italian Line, Italia Societa Per Azioni Di Navigazione Sede in Genova) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nunzio Orsini v. Italian Line, Italia Societa Per Azioni Di Navigazione Sede in Genova, 358 F.2d 735, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6834 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dissatisfied with a modest verdict of $1,200 in a personal injury case, the plaintiff, acting without counsel as is his right, has taken and argued this appeal. While it is clear that the plaintiff is convinced that the trial was unfairly conducted and that an inadequate verdict resulted, we find no such error as would warrant our interference with the jury’s decision as to the extent of the injury caused by the accident in suit, particularly since it is clear that much of plaintiff’s admittedly serious disability is the result of natural causes as well as an earlier accident.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dissatisfied with a modest verdict of $1,200 in a personal injury case, the plaintiff, acting without counsel as is his right, has taken and argued this appeal. While it is clear that the plaintiff is convinced that the trial was unfairly conducted and that an inadequate verdict resulted, we find no such error as would warrant our interference with the jury’s decision as to the extent of the injury caused by the accident in suit, particularly since it is clear that much of plaintiff’s admittedly serious disability is the result of natural causes as well as an earlier accident.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 F.2d 735, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nunzio-orsini-v-italian-line-italia-societa-per-azioni-di-navigazione-ca3-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack