Nunziata v. Nunziata

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nunziata v. Nunziata

272 A.D.2d 833

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 833 (Nunziata v. Nunziata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nunziata v. Nunziata, 272 A.D.2d 833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for the annulment of a marriage, defendant appeals from an order which awards to plaintiff alimony pendente lite, and a counsel fee. Order modified on the law and the facts by substituting for the present provisions thereof relative to temporary alimony and counsel fees, a provision that defendant pay, as temporary alimony, $10 per week, commencing as of January 21, 1947, and a counsel fee of $150, payable one half within ten days [834]*834and the balance when the action shall be reached for trial. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the amounts awarded for alimony and counsel fees were excessive. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for the annulment of a marriage, defendant appeals from an order which awards to plaintiff alimony pendente lite, and a counsel fee. Order modified on the law and the facts by substituting for the present provisions thereof relative to temporary alimony and counsel fees, a provision that defendant pay, as temporary alimony, $10 per week, commencing as of January 21, 1947, and a counsel fee of $150, payable one half within ten days [834]*834and the balance when the action shall be reached for trial. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the amounts awarded for alimony and counsel fees were excessive. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nunziata-v-nunziata-nyappdiv-1947.