Nuno v. Balz
265 So. 2d 10, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3484
This text of 265 So. 2d 10 (Nuno v. Balz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nuno v. Balz, 265 So. 2d 10, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3484 (Fla. 1972).
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. [11]*11We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shelby Michael Townsend v. Cathy Rose Woods Townsend Kinningham
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2002
Gibson v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.
386 So. 2d 520 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
265 So. 2d 10, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nuno-v-balz-fla-1972.