Nunnold v. Bluntach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nunnold v. Bluntach

123 N.Y.S. 1131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 123 N.Y.S. 1131 (Nunnold v. Bluntach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nunnold v. Bluntach, 123 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

SPRING and ROBSON, JJ., dissent upor the grounds: (1) That the referee erred in hold ing that the decree of the Surrogate’s Court conclusively established that there was an over payment to Helena Nunnold; (2) that the ref eree erred in not allowing to the defendants in terest on the $5,000 loan mentioned in the de cisión; (3) that on the merits the plaintiff wa not entitled to recover.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

SPRING and ROBSON, JJ., dissent upor the grounds: (1) That the referee erred in hold ing that the decree of the Surrogate’s Court conclusively established that there was an over payment to Helena Nunnold; (2) that the ref eree erred in not allowing to the defendants in terest on the $5,000 loan mentioned in the de cisión; (3) that on the merits the plaintiff wa not entitled to recover.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nunnold-v-bluntach-nyappdiv-1910.